Entries Tagged as ''

No, never did.

Somehow, I never read Grapes of Wrath before now:

The Western land, nervous under the beginning change. The Western states, nervous as horses before a thunderstorm. The great owners, nervous, sensing a change, knowing nothing of the nature of the change. The great owners, striking at the immediate thing, the widening government, the growing labor unity; striking at new taxes, at plans; not knowing these things are results, not causes. Results, not causes; results, not causes. The causes lie deep and simply — the causes are hunger in the stomach, multiplied one million times; a hunger in a single soul, hunger for joy and some security, multiplied one million times; muscles and mind aching to grow, to work, to create, multiplied one million times. The last clear definite function of men — muscles aching to work, minds aching to create beyond the single need — this is man. To build the wall, to build a house, the dam, and in the wall and house and dam to put something of Manself, and to Manself take back something of the wall, the house, the dam; to take heart muscles from the lifting, to take the clear lines and form from conceiving. For man, unlike anything organic or inorganic in the universe, grows beyond his work, walks up the stairs of his concepts, emerges ahead of his accomplishments. This you say is man — when theories change and crash, when schools, philosophies, when narrow dark alleys of thought, national, religious, economic, grow and disintegrate, man reaches, stumbles forward, painfully, mistakenly sometimes. Having stepped forward, he may slip back, but only half a step, never the full step back. This you may say and know it and know it. This you may know when the bombs plummet out of the black planes on the marketplace, when prisoners are stuck like pigs, and the crushed bodies drain filthily in the dust. You may know it in this way. If the step were not being taken, if the stumbling forward ache were not alive, the bombs would not fall, the throats would not be cut. Fear the time when the bombs stop falling while the bombers live — for every bomb is proof that the spirit has not died. And fear the time when the strikes stop while the great owners live — for every little beaten strike is proof that the step is being taken. In this you can know — fear the time when manself will not suffer and die for a concept, for this one quality is the foundation of man self, in this one quality is man, distinctive in the universe.

Cannery Row is certainly more fun, but reading Grapes while watching our would-be corporate masters struggle to maintain control is quite resonant….

285) Status Quo: The Complete Pye Collection

Like many people in the USA, I only knew Status Quo from “Pictures of Matchstick Men,” but I picked up this 3CD set for 10 bucks and found out they’re quite an institution in the UK. I also found out that a lot of there songs, at least from this period, aren’t very memorable; it seems like every time they wrote a good song, they then tried to copy that song 3 or 4 times. There are, for example, 3 other songs that sound A LOT like “Matchstick Men.” Donovan did much the same thing, I think. But, worth checking out if you have something else to do while listening….

286) Pere Ubu: The Story of My Life

Pere Ubu gets back together to record a CD? Could they have mortgages to pay, nostalgia to indulge in? Crap product to crank out? Nooooo! And, well, no, this isn’t just crap laurel-resting, though it’s not as prickly and experimental as their best stuff, and though they “disbanded” in 1982, they rebanded in 1993 for this recording and have produced stuff ever since. Now, if I could just find the version of Ubu Roi David Thomas did with the Quay Bros… oh, here is some of it.

287) Sparklehorse: Vivadixiesubmarinetransmissionplot

A while back I listened to It’s A Wonderful Life, my favorite Sparklehorse CD, and wondered why M. Linkous hadn’t made a recording that good since. A few days later, he committed suicide by shooting himself in the chest with a rifle. If you live long enough, these coincidences start to pile up. Anyway, this is also a good CD, not quite as good as It’s A Wonderful Life,
but nearly so; this was Sphorse’s debut, so the seeds of It’s A Wonderful Life are everywhere, some very good dissonant noise alongside the hushed baby voice songs.
Sorry the shit got too rough, Mark, rest in peace.

288) Gong: You

I never heard Gong, heard lots about them: hippy space rock stuff, like Hawkwind for people who though Hawkwind were too punk. And yep, that’s what this is:

Now I know.

289) Cowboy Junkies: The Nomad Series Vol 1.

An interesting direction for the Junkies to head in: grafting some Chinese sounds (literally–samples of people working, etc) onto the bluesy spooky groove, keeping the arrangments sparse; the title makes me think this will be the first of a few releases with the same theme, but with different countries and cultures visited. Good stuff.

290) Townes Van Zandt: Live at the Old Quarter

Such an underrated voice. Townes in known for his songwriting, but the way he sang them was incredible too, like a man so used to being ridden that the rider becomems part of him… CDs like this are exactly why I hate the band America.

Is a map an argument?

I read something the other day that has occupied my head ever since: the author was talking about the lukasa, a sacred object that the Luba people use in various rituals and which has a wealth of information encoded in its designs, cognitive cues meant to help the skilled reader tell stories, give advice, render judgment, and so forth. Many ritual objects serve this purpose, of course, but then the author went on to say that it was “more of a map than an argument.” The author is quite fastidious about acknowledging western bias elsewhere, so it’s not just that he is denigrating the lukasa, he is in fact delighted and amazed by it. He just thinks that maps are not arguments. I certainly understand his distinction; maps do not make overt attempts at persuasion… but they do, really, they persuade the person reading the map that the map is an accurate representation of whatever it is mapping, that it will help the reader get from here to there, and the act of successfully reading and using a map argues that maps are good for this kind of thing. And yet, maps leave out so much, they reduce 4 dimensional space (yes, I’m including time) to 2 dimensions, even the measurement of time is reduced to a 2-d coordinate plane. Maps have to reduce and impoverish the reality they describe, or they would be ineffective, since the map that takes everything in is not a map. Then there are maps to celebrity homes, and to fancy restaurants, and there are argument maps, and the musical artist maps, and–well, maps are a language, they are part of our grammatical brain structure, the means by which we constantly reduce and inflate the real and try to make it manageable. So, is language an argument? Perhaps defining terms would help, and no, that’s not meant as a joke. So, I’ll check the dictionary, which is a map, and also makes an argument:

map

/mæp/   verb, mapped, map·ping.

–noun

1.

a representation, usually on a flat surface, as of the features of an area of the earth or a portion of the heavens, showing them in their respective forms, sizes, and relationships according to some convention of representation: a map of Canada.
2.

a maplike delineation, representation, or reflection of anything: The old man’s face is a map of time.
3.

Mathematics . function ( def. 4a ) .
4.

Slang . the face: Wipe that smile off that ugly map of yours.
5.

Genetics . genetic map.
–verb (used with object)

6.

to represent or delineate on or as if on a map.
7.

to sketch or plan (often fol. by out ): to map out a new career.

—Idioms

8.

off the map, out of existence; into oblivion: Whole cities were wiped off the map.
9.

put on the map, to bring into the public eye; make known, famous, or prominent: The discovery of gold put our town on the map.

Origin:
1350–1400;  ME mappe- ( mounde ) < ML mappa mundī  map of the world; special use of L mappa  napkin, said to be < Punic
Wow, napkin? That makes weird sense. A map is a representation of something, often put on flexible material (like  napkin?)

ar·gu·ment

–noun

1.

an oral disagreement; verbal opposition; contention; altercation: a violent argument.
2.

a discussion involving differing points of view; debate: They were deeply involved in an argument about inflation.
3.

a process of reasoning; series of reasons: I couldn’t follow his argument.
4.

a statement, reason, or fact for or against a point: This is a strong argument in favor of her theory.
5.

an address or composition intended to convince or persuade; persuasive discourse.
6.

subject matter; theme: The central argument of his paper was presented clearly.
7.

an abstract or summary of the major points in a work of prose or poetry, or of sections of such a work.
8.

Mathematics .

a.

an independent variable of a function.
b.

Also called amplitude. the angle made by a given vector with the reference axis.
c.

the angle corresponding to a point representing a given complex number in polar coordinates. Compare principal argument.
9.

Computers . a variable in a program, to which a value will be assigned when the program is run: often given in parentheses following a function name and used to calculate the function.
10.

Obsolete .

a.

evidence or proof.
b.

a matter of contention.

Origin:
1325–75;  ME (< OF) < L argūmentum. See argue, -ment
Well, the definition of “argue” worked better, actually, but this definition helps, I think: an address or composition intended to convince or persuade; persuasive discourse.” A map is an address or composition, yes? And every time we use language, we are trying to persuade… what language use would be non-persuasive? I know I’m dithering here, that the usual, accepted connotations of “argue,” “map,” and “language” are intended to keep them distinct, lest our concepts become a soup–but even the way we conceptualize and distinguish between concepts, linguistically, is a kind of mapping, and a kind of argument. Boy, I’m hungry.

282) Gnarls Barkley: The Odd Couple
The bend of Cee-Lo’s voice and Dmouse’s hyper-perfect production is cool, a fine veneer, but they also make some good songs, when they don’t get lost in the veneer. “Who’s Gonna Save My Soul” sounds like Billie Holiday wandered into Blake Edward’s The Party and made everyone feel self-conscious, in a good way.

283) Captain Beyond: Sufficiently Breathless
If classic rock stations played classic rock everyone hadn’t heard a bazillion times, and if they didn’t pick the worst goddamn songs to play in the first place (“Feel Like Making Love”? “Whole Lotta Love”? “Could This Be Love”? Sheesh), then maybe they’d play Captain Beyond. Of course, they’d also play Uriah Heep, which would be not a good thing at all….

284) The Be Good Tanyas: Blue House
Didn’t I just listen to a Be Good Tanyas CD? Yep, I sure did. This one is equally fine, quiet and a little scary, as any group covering “Coo-Coo Bird” should be.